What must it be like to live the charmed life of a liberal/leftist Democrat politician in America?  As long as the message is the “right” one, the leftist can do no wrong. They will never be held to the same standard as a Conservative or a Republican. Just promise the people stuff, and assure them that the Government will take care of them. Get the people dependent on the Government and the leftist has it made. The media refuses to hold the left accountable and the left in return gets to thumb their noses at the rest of society as they sit perched on their pedestals, smug and secure in the knowledge that they will never be held to the same standard as their counterparts on the right. There seems to be no end to the corruption that is rampant in Hillary Clinton’s circle, but it does not matter. What matters more is that Donald Trump is a loudmouth, and his indiscretions that pale in comparison to Mrs. Clinton’s. One would be hard-pressed to find a six day old corpse that is more corrupt than Hillary Clinton. Her dubious past rolls across the decades, from her time as a young lawyer to her current Presidential bid; she has left a trail of corruption and lies that is unprecedented in modern politics. Mrs. Clinton’s political career is the political equivalent of an organized crime boss who because of his/her high priced lawyers, high powered connections and corrupt  resources fail to be get indicted for any of his illegal activities.

She lies with impunity with a goal of embellishing her status. This penchant for lying is what made her, out of thin air declare during her 2008 campaign for the white house that she came under sniper fire during her visit to Bosnia as first lady. In another instance she claimed that she was rejected by the Marine Corps for no other reason than being a woman. This lie, repeated often is meant to further solidify her credentials as a “champion of women’s rights.” It does not matter that it is not true, she repeats it anyway. Some more examples of stories made up out of whole cloth are about all her grandparents being immigrants. She lied about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary, about Benghazi and about her emails. Even after the FBI director gave his report to the American people and everyone heard him with their own ears say with his own mouth that Mrs. Clinton lied about her emails, she said with a straight face, and not a hint of embarrassment “Director Comey said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people” She is hardly held accountable for her actions by the press. This can be seen in the media’s response to all of the scandals that have engulfed her candidacy since it began. While they continue to be consumed by accusations of inappropriate sexual advances on women made against Donald Trump, Mrs. Clinton continues to skate on by with hardly a challenge to all of the corruption that has surrounded her over the years. For years, women who have claimed to be victims of sexual harassment, sexual assault or raped by her husband have alleged that Mrs. Clinton threatened to destroy their reputations and their lives. Despite these claims Mrs. Clinton has never been questioned as to the validity of these charges. Simultaneously we see that lesser accusations against Trump are given the exact opposite treatment by those in the media.

Her decent into the pits of corruption include her cattle futures “investment” of one thousand dollars with a return of one hundred thousand dollars. You can read more about that here. In addition to all of the questions surrounding her extreme stroke of “fortune” on this deal “the first couple was forced to pay an additional $14,615 in back taxes and interest after it was learned that the first lady had made more money on commodity trades than had been revealed to the public or to the IRS.” This would not be the last time the Clintons made this kind of “mistake” on their IRS filings. Years later in another display of questionable accounting, they again failed to accurately file taxes, this time for the Clinton Foundation. When their “mistake” was exposed, it was revealed that they failed to accurately disclose donations from foreign Governments.

The media has steadfastly refused to ask Mrs. Clinton about the connections between the Clinton foundation, the State Department, a 145 million dollar contribution to the foundation by powerful uranium magnates, and the Russian Government’s ownership stake in a large Uranium Company here in the United States. Some Media outlets have attempted to defend Mrs. Clinton’s role in this deal, but this article explains how it all ties together. What is most amazing is that this issue was not raised once during the Presidential debates.

We found out recently that one of Mrs. Clinton’s insiders and best friends, Governor Terry McAuliffe, and an influential PAC with whom he is associated gave a combined 700 thousand dollars to a Senate candidate who happened to be the wife of a high ranking FBI official who was given “an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails,”. According to the article, the gentleman “was promoted to deputy director after his wife’s campaign had concluded.” He ended up playing a crucial in the findings of FBI director Comey, in finding that Mrs. Clinton’s actions, though negligent and grossly inappropriate warranted no further action. What a coincidence!

With Hillary Clinton, America knows what they will get if she is elected as President, a woman who has been in public life for decades with no major accomplishment to show for it and a history of corruption. She has made it clear what she intends to do with the Supreme court, the Affordable Care Act, the Second Amendment, the First Amendment, allocating public funds for abortion, race relations, taxes and the list goes on. She has demonstrated that she cannot be trusted, and that she will say whatever is necessary to attain power. If these are the things that matter to you, and not the personality of the candidates then the choice is clear. Mr. Trump may not be a paragon of virtue himself but compared to Hillary Clinton…

One of the issues constantly raised about the Trump campaign is that his rise is fueled by the support of the white male. Trump is known to have a commanding lead in this demographic of voters. That fact is then used to promote the narrative that Mr. Trump’s supporters are racist. Many of these Americans have been labelled negatively for no other reason than that they are fed up with the status quo, they do not like the direction in which the country is going, or they are just fed up with the business as usual attitude of their leaders. The people of this demographic are constantly attacked and maligned, and their concerns dismissed because they are white. They are the one group about whom one can say just about anything without being held to the same standard that they are held to if they said something negative about another group.

On any given day one can tune in to the news stations, read the newspapers, listen to commentators, advocacy groups, comedians and others castigate the white male for different reasons. These attacks on white males almost seem like the cool thing to do. They are not only committed by fringe groups or radical extremists.  They are often carried out by mainstream organizations, high profile personalities and many others with influence. Often the rhetoric goes beyond the snide remarks about “white male privilege” to downright nasty, vitriolic, and hateful attacks. When people (mostly white men) raise concerns about this trend that seems to have gained traction among many in the populace, they are summarily dismissed, and their concerns are not given the same legitimacy that is given to other groups who fit the image of those targeted because of the color of their skin. Some view this as white men receiving mild comeuppance for their years of injustice, intolerance and other misdeeds that they have committed against others, and do not view it as a real problem.

Some of the things that have been said about, and to white males would generate widespread protests if they were said about any minority group. In the past we have seen people lose their jobs, resign from positions of influence, lose prestige and had their reputations tarnished and destroyed for saying hurtful things decades earlier, or making harmless jokes or other innocuous statements, all because the things said were against the “wrong” group, however; it is apparently clearly permissible to say much worse about white people in general, but particularly the white male.

One thing that is noteworthy and ironic in all of this is that the attacks on white males often come from other white people (mostly liberal men and feminists). There seems to be a concerted effort to shame white men into keeping quiet on the issues of our day. This is another strategic move by liberals/leftists who want to implement their radical agenda without any opposition. Since white males make up the largest group that opposes the liberal agenda, liberals are on a mission to delegitimize the white male in America and shame them into silence. It is for this reason that many white people in liberal circles see themselves as enlightened and courageous for identifying white males as the cause for many of the problems in America. They can then self-righteously proclaim that anyone who does not make the changes that they deem necessary are steeped in their prejudice and racism. That is why this group of Americans who have the same needs, the same fears, who share many of the same goals and aspirations for themselves, their families and friends can so easily be disparaged. After all, they are not like the rest of the population. They deserve the treatment that they get. They brought it on themselves by being such horrible people.

It is now commonplace to hear people joyously talk about how white people are about to be a minority group in the coming decades. People see it as a reason for celebration that the numbers of the largest ethnic group in America are dwindling. Think about that for a minute! In this celebration is the not so subtle notion that white people are evil and therefore their dwindling numbers are a reason to rejoice. It is a sad reflection on any society that hatred against a particular group has been justified to the point that it is now considered as a sign of progress that their numbers are declining. Here they make fun of it.

Universities now teach courses in white privilege. The idea behind this is that simply by being white, white people have an easy life or automatically get some kind of head start if front of everyone else. This concept is based purely on a narrative that has been propagated by those who profit in the race industry. It is not based on the idea that we should judge all people, or make conclusions about them based on merit. Instead, a large blanket is cast on a whole group of people, deeming them privileged. The message is clear. It is ok to cast aspersions on a whole group of people, and make blanket statements about them as long as those people are white.

The following is a list of some things that have been said about white people:

Last year a caller into a radio program affiliated with the black lives matter movement said: “when those mother f**kers are by themselves, that’s when we should start f***ing them up. Like they do us, when a bunch of them ni**ers takin’ one of us out, that’s how we should roll up.”   “Cause we already roll up in gangs anyway. There should be six or seven black mother f**ckers, see that white person, and then lynch their ass. Let’s turn the tables.” The radio host responded approvingly with no rebuke of the caller and there was no outcry in the media.

Cornell University (you read that right folks, Cornell University) Assistant Professor Russell Rickford said that some white people are ready to commit race suicide and that this “treason to whiteness” would be an “expression of their loyalty to humanity.” He still teaches at Cornell where he peddles in white hatred daily.

Massachusetts College of Art and Design Professor, Dr. Noel Ignatiev called for the destruction of the White race. He said that “if you are a white male you do not deserve to live.” You are a cancer, you’re a disease, and “white males have never contributed anything positive to the world They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites!” He was praised for his speech.

North Carolina State University Professor Kamau Kambon said that the solution to the problems faced by many blacks is the “extermination of white people off the face of the planet.”

A few days ago students at Berkley University protested to demand “safe spaces” and “spaces of color.” They blocked access to certain areas of the university, but allowed non protesters who were not white to pass while harassing white students and refusing to let them pass. Similar targeting of white students on campuses happen frequently

Recently students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison rolled out a clothing line that castigated white people. One of the pieces had a sign emblazoned on the front that reads “All white people are racists.” A description of the product line reads: “Racism is a set of systemic, institutional, cultural, and epistemological (although not limited to said forms) structures that inherently empowers white folk and in turn disempowers people of color.” There were no repercussions to the students.

President Obama’s national security advisor Susan Rice told students at Florida international University that “there are too many white people in key government posts, creating the danger of “groupthink” that could put U.S. security at risk”. Other madness includes separate housing for black students, and a “minority only” conference on another college campus.

During the Milwaukee riots a few months ago, the rioters turned their attention and their rage toward any white person in the vicinity within their reach and proceeded to beat them for no other reason than being white. The media was mostly silent on this.

Every year across the country groups of marauding black teens in flash mobs ranging in numbers up to 250, and other gangs randomly target and attack white people at malls, on city streets and other public places. In the aftermath of them wreaking havoc the media usually comes out to reassure everyone that the attacks were not racially motivated, just as they do when they report on the “knockout game” where most of the attacks are black on white.

One does not have to look too far to find examples of this attitude and behavior by prominent people and mainstream organizations toward white people.

This is not meant to portray white people as victims, but to highlight a very disturbing trend that history has always shown to be dangerous when tolerated and not confronted. The world and history is littered with examples of how badly this type of behavior, if allowed to fester can turn out. This type of intolerance when accepted on a micro level always ends up being problematic in the long run. Every time we discuss racism in America it is from the perspective of white racism against blacks, but no one can point to similar behavior by whites or any other group being considered as acceptable behavior. The slightest hint of racism by whites evokes the harshest criticism, condemnation, and intense media coverage. Many times racist motives are even attributed to people when there is none. For some reason this behavior is tolerable when done to whites.

Many people will be dismissive of the argument that white people are the victims of racism, some will suggest that the examples are just a little bit of “karma.” They will tell us that these are just some examples of “what goes around comes around,” others will say let’s not overreact this is just “poetic justice,” or no big deal.  This attitude is dangerous. Remember that most current day white Americans have no connection to Jim Crowe, Slavery, or any of the injustices commited by white people in the past, but even if they did through their progenitors; they are not responsible for the sins of others in the past. We still owe it to treat people based on merit. We will do well to remember the words of Dr. Martin Luther King and remember his dream of living in a nation where people are judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Let us also heed his warning that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Share this page

As the cost of Obamacare escalates, as premiums go through the roof, and the cost of co-pays and deductibles head into the stratosphere, people are surprised by it. There have been cutbacks on medicare that are negatively affecting seniors that opponents of Obamacare warned about, and the quality of care is deteriorating. Many insurance companies are leaving the exchanges, and as a result there are fewer choices for people looking to buy health plans. With fewer companies participating in the exchanges, the costs naturally go up. Tax payer dollars are now being used to cover the cost of abortions despite promises that this was not going to happen, people have lost their doctors and many have been forced to give up high quality plans because they did not meet the Affordable Care Act standards, for example; everyone is forced to have maternity care on their plan whether or not they need it (male or female). So if one had a plan he/she was perfectly happy with, he would have had to give it up and take on plans that were exponentially higher because they include all of the mandates of Obamacare. Everybody knew this was going to happen, but those who warned of everything that we are seeing now were accused of not caring for the poor and the dispossessed. As usual liberals/leftists refused to argue on the merit of the issue, their arguments were based purely on emotions and now people are reaping the consequences of putting their trust in the all powerful government who knows what is best for each individual.

For years Republicans and conservatives have complained that the media is biased against them. They claim that the media purposely misrepresents their views and that the media was complicit in pushing the narrative that this whole political party/movement/ideology was based on a platform of bigotry. The media has framed various aspects of this political platform as steeped in the desire to keep down certain segments of society and keep them at a perpetual disadvantage. Conservatives who wished to implement voter identification laws have been cast as wanting to suppress the black vote. The desire to stem the flow of illegal immigration is portrayed as anti-immigrant. Those who oppose abortion because they believe that it is a reprehensible immoral act to take the lives of the most vulnerable in our society are accused of waging a war on women  and “wanting to tell women what to do with their own bodies.” The misrepresentation does not end with these deliberate distortions. Those who oppose gay marriage are called homophobic. Anyone who wants to see a revision of the tax code and calls for lower taxes for all are accused of “being for the rich.” Then there is the classic “climate change deniers” charge, that is applied to anyone who dares to question the notion that human beings are destroying the planet in the process of simply living their daily lives. This tactic employed by the media in partnership with the Democrat party is used to shame people into silence. Many of the arguments against the positions that conservatives hold are incapable of surviving on their own merit. In the arena of ideas, many of them simply do not stand a chance of survival, so a full on scorched earth assault, designed to make people afraid of voicing their opinions is used to make them afraid of stating their views.

Despite the obvious, the media has always denied its bias and casually dismisses those who call them out on it. Recent development that have come about as a result of the WikiLeaks dump validates what so many have always known-that the media is actively involved in helping to promote a leftist/liberal agenda. Some of the things that we have found out in the last few days include the following:

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos and the Clinton Campaign colluded in an effort to discredit the author of “Clinton Cash”. “Clinton Cash” is an account of how the Clinton’s used their Foundation to get rich through “pay for play” and the general selling of influence to anyone willing to pay the price. The book is said to reveal a host of questionable, unethical and in some cases even illegal behavior between the Clintons and outside entities.

Though she denied it, emails showed that CNNs Donna Brazile was given a question ahead of time that was going to be asked of Hillary Clinton. Brazile then passed the question to the Clinton campaign helping the Democrat to get an unfair advantage ahead of the debate.

Mark Leibovich, a reporter from Time, said to the Clinton Campaign Manager about some questions that he had for Mrs. Clinton: “I wanted the option to use all — and you could veto what you didn’t want. That’s why I selected the 5 or 6 I sent to you.”

The Politico’s chief correspondent Glenn Thrush, in an email to John Podesta where he sought approval of a story he intended to run admitted that he was a “hack” for doing that.

Other indicators of the media’s bias can be seen in NBC’s release of the lewd talking Trump recording. NBC was long in possession of this tape and they held on to it with the intent of strategically releasing it to dominate the news cycle leading up to the second presidential debate. This was designed to help the Clinton campaign while simultaneously putting the brakes on Mr. Trumps momentum, and perhaps even bring it to a halt. This is not the action of a news organization that is supposed to be impartial while reporting the news. This is the action of an advocate.

As people remain consumed by the Trump recordings and the accusations against him, the damning revelations against Mrs. Clinton in the WikiLeaks dump is ignored or given minimal coverage by the news media. As they prosecute their case against Mr. Trump, and every indiscretion of his life is put under the microscope, we see that the same treatment is not meted out to Mrs. Clinton. She has never been asked about her treatment of her husband’s accusers. She has never been asked about laughing in an interview over the fact that she was able to get a lesser sentence for the man who was accused of raping a twelve year old who she accused in court of “seeking out older men, in fact”; CNN Reporter Don Lemon has gone so far as to deny that she laughed in the interview, though it is plain to anyone who listens to the tape that Mrs. Clinton is laughing in her discussion of the trial. The Associated Press claims that Donald Trump was wrong when he said that Bill Clinton Never lost his law license. Joy Behar of The View called Bill and Hillary’s accuser’s tramps, and she received no backlash from the media for this. During this whole election campaign cycle, not one question has been directed Hillary Clinton’s way about the negative reports surrounding the Clinton Foundation. She has lied about coming under sniper fire while visiting another country, she has lied about being named after sir Edmond Hillary, she has lied (as we found out from WikiLeaks) about being rejected from the Marines because she was a woman.

Donald Trump is constantly asked about every rumor surrounding him while Mrs. Clinton manages to get away from being questioned about any of the sensational rumors around her.  The blatant examples of bias are endless and serves to show why the press has generally lost its way, and has such a low trust rating. They no longer serve as watch dogs keeping leaders accountable in a Democratic society. They now serve as watchdogs for Democrats and the liberal agenda. The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds. Al Gore has been tapped to campaign for Mrs. Clinton while himself being accused as a serial sexual harasser, and no one calls that into question. The examples of media bias without any measure of self-awareness on their part is stunning.

Trump is not the best candidate, many in the Republican Party wish that some other candidate had won the candidacy, but one thing is certain Mr. Trump fights back. The media and the Democratic Party are not accustomed to that, and because of this they have made it their mission to take him down. In the meantime many people who under normal circumstances would never support Trump are rallying more behind him because finally they see someone who is not willing to roll over and play dead after any unfounded accusation of racism or scurrilous accusation meant to destroy his character is lobbed his way. There are two candidates, one is corrupt to the high heavens and has no problem using executive orders to further erode basic rights that people have enjoyed for centuries, and implement unpopular policies that do not stand a chance of making it pass congress. She has made it plain what she intends to do about the Supreme Court, and many other issues that people care about. Her record of failure is stark, in fact she has no significant accomplishment in all of her years in public service. On the other hand we have another candidate who has said some outlandish things and conducted himself in a very untoward manner during the election cycle. He has flip flopped on a lot of the issues, but by the same token he has been very consistent on many of the important ones. The choices could not be clearer. If the issues are what matter to you, and not the personalities of the individuals involved then this is a clear choice.

Share if you like the article

 

 

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/10/14/al-gore-media-silent-hillary-clinton-accused-sexual-predator/

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/brent-baker/2016/10/13/e-mail-shows-stephanopoulos-colluded-clinton-campaign-discredit

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/matthew-balan/2016/10/13/cnns-tapper-tvone-anchor-leaked-town-hall-question-brazile

http://newsninja2012.com/dandy-don-lemon-claims-hillary-clinton-didnt-laugh-at-rape-victim/

Ever since the early days of the Trump Campaign when there were a couple of minor skirmishes between Trump supporters and agitators, the media has gone out of the way to portray Trump rallies as violence fueled mob demonstrations (this was never the case). Donald Trump did himself no favors by encouraging people to inappropriately respond to Democrat agitators in the crowd who were trying to bait such a response. In one instance one man even tried to rush Donald Trump on the stage and had to be restrained by secret service agents. Generally speaking though, there was no more than the regular amount of tussles that you get between supporters of the different parties during every Presidential election. No one was seriously hurt in any of these incidents, and a few people were arrested. Mr. Trump was rightly confronted for telling a few of his supporters in one incident that he will pay their legal fees if they punched someone in the face, in response to an attempt to disrupt one of his rallies. The news media were particularly tough on Mr. Trump (as they should have been) in calling him out on the way he handled these tense situations at his rallies. A Presidential candidate should know better than that, and should encourage cooler heads to prevail rather that respond in the manner that he urged on a few occasions. As has been said on more than one occasion, Donald Trump certainly has not always carried himself in the manner of one aspiring to the highest office in the land, and the most powerful position in the world. After these minor incidents, and being confronted on his role and his response to them, Mr. Trump toned down his rhetoric in responding to agitators at his rallies, and instead began urging his supporters to respond differently to the image that they helped to create.

Since those early days of the campaign, Mr. Trump’s campaign rallies have been more exemplary. Unfortunately, his opponents have failed to acknowledge this, but have gone out of their way to continue painting the Trump supporters as driven by violence. The opposite has been true and instead the tables have turned significantly. There have been many attacks against Trump’s supporters. The response by the traditional media to this violence has been the sound of crickets chirping sweetly in the night. It is astounding that these attacks and general attempts to incite violence by Trump opponents have gone unreported by the liberal arm of the media machine. As usual, reporting on these incidents have been covered largely by those news organizations that leftists/liberals love to hate-Fox News, The Drudge Report Breitbart and others, in addition to talk radio. Leftists/liberals love to call conservatives “conspiracy theorists” whenever conservatives point out liberal bias, but this issue of violence against Trump supporters is one of the starkest examples of this bias by the media. Back in June, supporters of Donald Trump were attacked as they left one of his rallies. People were cornered, some were surrounded beaten to the ground, pelted with bottles, egged etc. In a stunning response to these vicious attacks, the Mayor of San Jose blamed the attacks on Trump supporters. After the attacks, Vox’s Editor Emmet Rensin justified this aggression. He used violence against Hitler as an analogy to justify the attacks on Mr. Trump’s supporters. Back in August Mr. Trump’s motorcade was attacked by protesters, and many of his supporters were also attacked by the protesters. The media downplayed the incident and cast it as just some rowdy protesters against Trump. Since then there have been more attacks against Trump’s supporters, but in all of these situations, when they are mentioned; they are somehow explained as being the fault of the people against whom the acts of violence were perpetrated. Mr. Trump’s supporters are always blamed for the attacks against themselves. The most recent example of this is the bombing of the North Carolina GOP office on Sunday 16 October 2016. CNN somehow managed to spin this act of terrorism by blaming it on Donald Trump.

Yesterday Breitbart news featured an investigative report by Project Veritas that claimed Democrats were using trained provocateurs to incite violence at Republican events across the country employing a tactic called “bird-dogging.” The tactic is allegedly being employed by a Chicago activist named Robert Creamer in coordination with one Scott Foval working with some members of the Clinton campaign. Quite a bit of damning evidence was caught on camera with some of the main actors explaining how they involve purposely stirring up trouble at Trump rallies in an effort to create an unfavorable political atmosphere around him. The term that they used was to create a sense of anarchy around Mr. Trump. This is news that would be looping across the networks if such a thing was happening against the Clinton campaign, and Trump supporters were doing it in coordination with his campaign, but as usual those who raise concerns about this will likely be called conspiracy theorists, using the age old liberal tactic of attempting to insult people into silence. This is not surprising to anyone who knows even a little bit about a man by the name of Saul Alinsky who wrote a book called Rules for Radicals, in which he explains how to achieve the goal of a Social State. Rule number five states that “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon,” rule number 13 states “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” This is why liberals are seldom willing to engage in the market place of ideas, and often resort to demonizing people to the point where they successfully discredit them without offering a counter argument. In the words of Mr. Alinsky “It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.”

It is hard to imagine a time when the press has been so blatantly hostile to any Presidential candidate as they are to Donald Trump while simultaneously ignoring the indiscretions of the opposing Presidential candidate whose deeds far negatively outweigh anything that Mr. Trump has said. One does not have to be a fan or supporter of Donald Trump to see this. It is as clear as the blue sky on a bright summer day. In the end people have to vote for who they want, but please know the issues, have convictions, and vote accordingly.

Share if you like the article

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/06/02/blood-san-jose-anti-trump-protesters-attack-trump-supporters/

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/20/progressives-attack-donald-trumps-event/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/09/time_for_the_left_to_stop_excusing_violence_against_trump_supporters_130831.html

http://matthewvadum.blogspot.com/p/saul-alinskys-24-rules-for-radicals.html

It is not racist nor is it controversial to think that something must be done to address the problem of illegal immigration. It in fact makes sense to address the very real issues that stem from the problem of illegal immigration. People bring their values with them wherever they travel, and if there is a constant influx of illegal immigrants from poor countries, with high crime rates, problems with illegal drugs, lack of education, high rates of single parent homes and many of the social ills that contribute to being a drag on societies and their economies, then it is no stretch to imagine that many of these problems would be transferred to the countries where they emigrate. If then a country does not enforce its borders, and allows into the society an influx of illegal immigrants who do not share their values, then that society will inevitable suffer the consequences of allowing such an indiscriminate flow of people into its borders, as many of these imported values will eventually take root in the illegally adopted society. Many of the people who come to the country illegally are not doctors, engineers, lawyers, scientists and other professionals whose education gives them an edge to more quickly adapt to American traditions, and who are able to immediately contribute to these important fields of endeavor. Many illegal immigrants come from countries that do not hold to the dying American ideal of limited Government and individual freedom where people are responsible for their own destiny. Many of them arrive with an expectation that they will be recipients of America’s generous welfare programs and in fact end up being dependent on these programs despite their illegal status.

if a country’s culture is to change, it should happen through a natural evolutionary process that takes place over a period of time as new developments occur. It should not be through a forced, abrupt implementation of alien customs that people have no choice in accepting. America has developed its own culture over the centuries that is derived from a mixture of several influences which have metamorphosed into a culture that is uniquely American. Anyone coming into this country should adapt to the culture of this country-the culture that is uniquely American. Many illegal immigrants come to America and end up in enclaves where many of the negative aspects of the countries from which they came are prevalent or the norm. They often do not hold to the same values. Many of their traditions are part of a counter culture that is not just different, but contrary to American culture, and they have a cavalier and/or dismissive attitude towards American traditions. Many of them expect that Americans cater to their differences, and they refuse to integrate and become part of the larger American Culture. When Americans say that those coming here are the ones who must adjust, these Americans are often accused of intolerance and racism. Most of the illegal immigrants who come to America are from third world countries where they often treat women as second class citizens, they don’t view drinking and driving with the same severity, attitudes towards sexual violence are different, many of them have warped “honor codes,” violence as a means of settling disputes is common in addition to a host of other undesirable behaviors. Many illegal immigrants come to America as seasoned adults who behave in a way that is not compatible with American culture. That is simply not acceptable for many who are concerned with the problem of illegal immigration and these issues must be addressed.

The unabated flow of illegal immigrants will inevitably have a negative economic impact on the country, its citizens, and legal residents who went through the legal process to get permission to live in this country. The large number of low skilled workers who come in to the country help to drive down the wages of Americans, and the issue of “doing jobs that Americans will not do” would continue because many of the people who come illegally in to the country will gladly work for less, driving down the cost of wages for American citizens . The government’s duty is first and foremost to its citizens and residents. There is a moral responsibility to help those who come from other countries who and are less fortunate, but there must be rules, regulations and controls in place to do this efficiently and effectively, in addition; those who wish to come to America must abide by the guidelines that are in place to move here. Many (not all) of the people who come to America have no allegiance to the country, their only concern is to work and send remittances to their country of origin, and this is of no benefit to the United States. The United States owes it to itself to place pressure on the Governments of the corrupt nations from where a large number of illegal immigrants come, to put pressure on them to end corruption, and implement economic policies that give their people a chance at improving their lives. If these governments know that they can “fix” many of their problems by simply allowing an exodus of their citizens to the United States, these governments have no incentive to change the way that they conduct their nations’ business. They then get to continue with their corruption and misrepresentation in perpetuity. The nations from where illegal immigrants come are the ones whose obligation it is to have and put systems in place designed to elevate people from poverty, raise their standard of living, improve their education, and help to make the lives of their citizens generally better.

In addition to the economic problems affiliated with the indiscriminate flow of illegal immigration, there are also medical issues associated with it. America, like other countries in the developed world has done an excellent job eradicating many contagious diseases that much of the developing world still combats. Illegal immigration poses a risk to the welfare of Americans in this regard. Legal immigrants and refugees are required to undergo a rigorous health screening before they are allowed entry into the United States. The center for disease control oversees the program to ensure that those coming to live here do not pose a threat to the health of Americans. Public health institutions assure us that there is no significant risk of contagious diseases to Americans, but these assurances do not take away people’s ability to think and reason logically. In addition, there are numerous examples of the incompetence of Government in efficiently managing even the simplest problems, so being dismissive of the potential health threats posed by illegal immigrants on whom there is no reliable health data is not reassuring to anyone.

Many of the people who wish to come to this country are simply looking for a chance to improve their lives, and also make life better for their families, but nations have laws and people must adhere to these laws the same way that citizens are required to obey the laws of their country. No country has the means to accommodate the indiscriminate flow of illegal immigrants into its borders. Sovereign Nations have a right to set up immigration policies that are beneficial to the countries and their citizens while also extending a helping hand to those in need. There is a compassionate and humane way to deal with the issue of illegal immigration, but it should not involve rewarding people with citizenship for breaking American laws. They should not be allowed the privilege of being able to directly influence and/or determine the trajectory of the nation’s future. Exactly what the right answers are to dealing with the problem is something that should be open to discussion. Those who point out the obvious problems that are inherent in illegal immigration should not be demonized for wanting to fix and end the problem. It is not racist to do that!

The people who continue to say that Bill Clinton is not running for President, and therefore bringing up his sexual predation from the past s is not legitimate issue, are missing the point. The main point of bringing up Clinton’s alleged abuse of these women is because of what they say happened to them after they were targeted by him. They claim that Hillary Clinton who champions herself as the defender of women’s rights and issues, tried to destroy their reputations after they complained about Mr. Clinton. These women say that they were viciously targeted by Mrs. Clinton for daring to raise the issue of her husband’s alleged abuse. That is the point of raising the issue. Everyone knows that Bill Clinton is not running for President, but shouldn’t the Candidate running for President of the United States (in this case Mrs. Clinton) accused of intimidating  rape/sexual assault/sexual harassment victims, at least be questioned with the same rigor and vigor that anyone else (especially a Republican/conservative) in the same position would have to undergo? Why is she not being held to the same standard with an issue as critical as this? How about the twelve year old girl that she targeted as she blamed the victim, during the trial in the defense of the child’s alleged rapist?  It is one thing to do ones job as a defense attorney, but it is quite another thing to laugh about how one was able to get the defendant a lesser sentence based on a technicality, though she was sure in her mind that the defendant was guilty of raping the little girl.  Do these things even matter to people who are concerned with Donald Trump’s words? Hopefully this clears up the issue for the people who refuse to exercise a little bit of intellectual scrutiny on the matter. Hillary Clinton has never, ever been asked about these things, and they should be addressed. If Donald Trump can be castigated for his words from eleven years ago, former Secretary Clinton must be also called upon to give account for her alleged actions. Under different circumstances these women’s cases would have been given a lot more sympathetic coverage, but as usual with leftists/liberals; the cause is bigger than any individual. The mission of turning America into a socialist Utopia is what matters more than anything, and anyone who promises to promote an agenda that furthers that cause will never be held to the same standard by the media. This is why alternative media outlets like Fox news, the Drudge Report and other non-traditional news organizations are so important.

So much attention is being paid to the things that Donald Trump has said, but Hillary Clinton’s actions are continually excused. So much of what she has done is harmful to the country, but the people are willing to promote her to the highest office in the land, and the most powerful position in the world because Donald Trump is such a meanie. Hillary Clinton promises everyone free stuff, and to take care of every ones needs, and that seems to be enough to ignore the destructive policies that she supports, plus her history of unbridled corruption. She says that she will tax the rich and raise the minimum wage, and people respond emotionally to these promises. So many people are unwilling to do any deeper inquiry and investigate further what the macro effects of these policies will be, and are willing to just go along with them. So much shocking, and devastating information has been revealed in the most recent WikiLeaks document dump that confirms much of what we have known about Mrs. Clinton, but the media’s attention remains focused on some obscene language spoken by Donald Trump eleven years ago. No one is defending Mr. Trump’s behavior from earlier in the campaign or his crude conduct prior to that, but people need to see Hillary Clinton in the light of her actions.

In her answer to the question about who she will appoint to the Supreme Court, Mrs. Clinton failed to list fidelity to the constitution as her main criteria for appointing her chosen jurists. She wants to appoint judges who will promote her agenda. Religious freedom in America has been threatened under the reign of the Obama Administration and other Democrats across the country in a way that would have been unimaginable just a few years ago. They have also shown their disdain for freedom of the press by their constant attempts to regulate the internet and content websites that are critical of their policies, while freedom of speech is constantly coming under assault more and more like never before, as people are punished for saying the “wrong thing”. Business people have been taken to court and fined for following their conscience on issues that were not considered controversial as recently as ten years ago.

Religious freedom, freedom of the press, and freedom of speech are the bedrocks of a free society, and will be threatened by a left leaning Supreme Court. These concerns are not borne out of paranoia, but from recent precedents set by the Democrat Party. If people are fine with these very real concerns, if these things do not matter, if no one is worried about the effects that a left leaning court will have on the country, then Hillary Clinton is the unmistakable candidate. Remember the words of David Hume “it is seldom that freedom of any kind is lost all at once”.

A couple of years ago a prominent news anchor on a major TV News Network (NBC) expressed his desire for someone to defecate in Sarah Palin’s mouth. His diatribe was filled with vitriol. It was an insult riddled piece that attacked Mrs. Palin as “America’s resident dunce” and her “long deceased mind” for using slavery as an analogy for when America’s trillion dollar debt becomes due. Mr. Bashir did not see it fit to deconstruct her argument, and show why he disagreed with her use of the term, but instead made it a point to insult her in the most demeaning way possible. The self-appointed champions of women’s rights on the left were conspicuous in their thunderous, resounding silence because in the world of the left, it is permissible to say anything about conservative women and there will be no backlash. Like black conservatives who are always attacked as “coons, Uncle Toms, and house ni…rs,” conservative women are prime targets of the intolerant left for straying from the liberal plantation. It is for this reason that Bill Maher a few years ago could refer on CNN, with no repercussions to Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin as MILFs (another widely viewed network). Piers Morgan who was hosting the program failed to reprimand his guest for the use of the crude term. Mr. Maher went on to use some other choice words to describe these women who dare to march to the beat of their own drum, while his audience could hardly control themselves chuckling, because they found him so very funny. He called these self made women Bimbo’s, c..ts, t..ts and other names that he pulled out of his wide ranging vocabulary. Not once did this man’s actions ever incur the wrath of the guardians of women’s rights on the left who are always on the lookout for misogyny, that we see when there is the smallest perceived slight towards women from conservatives. Mr. Maher, with his thigh slapping, belly holding, rib tickling, side splitting humor even made jokes about Rick Santorum’s wife using a vibrator, with no media outrage. This treatment of conservative women does not end with Bill Maher. Some of the vilest things have been said by very prominent personalities about conservative women, that; in pursuit of fulfilling the liberal agenda is considered as fair game.

For years the media has excused the behavior Bill Clinton towards numerous women who have accused him of rape, sexual assault or sexual harassment. Mr. Clinton’s defenders have always been swift in their defense of him. Many of the women in question claim to have been threatened by the Clinton Machine, and forced to retreat into silence for fear of crossing these powerful people. In one prominent case, Mr. Clinton’s campaign manager (James Carville), in his effort to discredit one of Mr. Clinton’s accusers famously said of her; if you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find”. In many of these cases, Hillary Clinton has been accused of waging a war to destroy these women’s reputations and their credibility, in order to protect her husband. For years the Clintons have been given a pass by the media, coming under very little scrutiny while others (especially conservatives) have had their lives and reputations destroyed for far less.

In the light of all of these incidents, the media’s double standard that is applied to Donald Trump is breath taking, and mind boggling in its hypocrisy. Donald Trump’s behavior as revealed in the eleven year old recording released by the Washington Post is unacceptable. No one listening to the tape recording of him can excuse his behavior, but in the end his behavior was not criminal. Though many will object to the behavior it is not uncommon to hear men engage in this type of banter amongst themselves. This type of male braggadocio is nothing strange to a lot of men, is common in locker rooms across the country and in cultures around the world. Some men aspire to be more conscious, and aware about their behavior. They conduct themselves in a more appropriate and dignified manner even when no one is watching. That is the type man that young men should aspire and strive to be. It is what many parents teach their sons, but we live in an imperfect world where people are flawed, and often merely give in to their basic instincts.

We should expect, and demand more of a Presidential candidate. The people aspiring to higher office should be exemplars of propriety who young people can look to, and others can point to as those whose lives could be emulated. Though people are justifiably disappointed in Mr. Trump, the recording does not show that he traversed the pathway from simply talking about his sexual exploits and fantasies to abusing women.

In the end, we have two candidates vying for the Presidency of the United States. If anyone is concerned about the balance of power on the Supreme Court tilting towards the left then you know how to vote. If anyone is concerned about the unabated flow of illegal immigrants into the country then the choice is clear. For those who worry about continued infringements of the first amendment, and further deterioration of the second Amendment, there is only one of these two candidates who also have these issues as priorities. One candidate recognizes the threat of Islamic terrorism to the country and the world, the other does not (or refuses to acknowledge it). If you are concerned about law and order, and race relations in the country; the positions of both candidates are very clear. One candidate loves America and wants to make it better, the other thinks it is a terrible place that can only be fixed with more government impositions on people’s lives. If anyone wants to stop the country’s rapid descent into socialism then the choice is unmistakable.

One candidate is crude, politically incorrect, says mean things, and has a tendency to come across as a complete jerk, the other has a record of spectacular failure, unmitigated corruption, thumbs her nose at the rules and believes that they do not apply her. This is it, these are the candidates. People could cast their vote based on emotion, or based on a careful examination of the issues that matter to them, then vote for the candidate whose positions most closely aligns to theirs, and that they honestly believe would be best for the country. Do not get entrapped by the dishonest media. Thank God for news outlets like Fox news that help to counter all of the media bias that is constantly on display, no wonder liberals go into conniptions over these news organizations.

Folks it is no secret that Donald Trump lost a billion dollars in 1995, in fact; the news organization (The New York Times) that released Mr. Trump’s tax returns a couple of days ago lamenting that he paid no taxes, is the same News organization that wrote a glowing article on Mr. Trump’s ability to bounce back from such a colossal loss. The article extolled Mr. Trump’s resilience, and his ability to keep moving forward despite setbacks. Mr. Trump wrote a book about his losses, what he went through and what he had to do to come back from that adversity. His book was called “The Art of the Comeback”.At one time in America, stories like these were praised and held up as examples that demonstrated the never say die attitude of the American spirit. Today, thanks to the Democrat party and their propensity to play class warfare; people look askance at stories like this instead of celebrating it. They also forget that many successful people in the world, and in our history experienced tremendous failure (see the story of Abraham Lincoln) before making their mark in the world.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in doing what Mr. Trump did! He did what every American does when it is tax time. There is not one person who does not try to pay as little as possible when tax time comes around. People use all of the deductions available to them in order to decrease their tax burden, and to do anything less would be not just irresponsible, but it would be foolish. The man’s business suffered a net operating loss during that year, which means that his business deductions exceeded his business income. The deduction that he used is not a loophole for the rich and famous. This is a strategy that many business owners use to offset the burden of losses to their businesses, and assist in their recovery. When the business makes money the government gets its cut, when the business loses money; the law allows business owners to apply current losses against future income. It can be applied for up to eighteen years, depending on all of the circumstances. There is no virtue in paying more taxes than one owes, especially to a government that is twenty trillion dollars in debt. We have all the proof we need that the federal government is wasteful, often corrupt, they over spend and abuse taxpayers’ money. Who amongst us would pay one red cent to the government if we did not have to do it?  To anyone who is angry that “the rich are not paying their fair share,” think about it for a moment. Many people make claims for their children, they seek deductions for mortgages, tuition and other tax credits in an effort to pay as little in taxes as possible. In the end most people end up paying substantially lower tax rates at the end of each year as is often evidenced by the smiles on people’s faces when they see their tax return checks. Some people can make more claims on their tax returns than others, and as a result get back more than others, for instance; those with more dependent children get back more money. Single people who have no deductions or claims pay more in taxes. That is just the way that the system works. Business people can often make more deductions which allow them to pay a low rate. There is no magical formula to make everything equal unless there is a flat across the board tax that everyone pays.

There is nothing patriotic about paying more taxes than one owes. A man’s generosity is not determined by the amount of money he gives to the government. His civic responsibility is met when he gives to the government that which he owes. A person’s (rich or poor’s) money does not belong to the government to use as they please. It is not their money. If there are loopholes in the tax code that people exploit and the government thinks is unfair, then it is up to the congress to tackle the issue and make it into a more simplified system. The Democrats had a super majority where they could have passed any bill for two years, but did nothing about that.

The Clinton campaign of course wasted no time after the New York Times story was printed and pounced on what they saw as an opportunity to chastise Mr. Trump, and gain some momentum. They smugly used the “news” to pontificate about “the rigged system”. In a classic case of hypocrisy though, we then found out that Mrs. Clinton and her husband used the same tax law to offset an incurred loss on their Wall Street generated capital gains (not a business loss). In perhaps the most brazen yet curiously unaware (by the New York Times) twist of irony, we also found out that the New York Times paid no taxes in 2014 after generating a net profit of over three million dollars for their organization.

The Clinton foundation is a billion dollar organization that gives less than 10 percent of the money it receives to charity, but for some reason the New York Times does not see this as news worthy, it does not bother the New York Times that the foundation “misfiled” it’s taxes up to five years back. They had to refile the foundation’s taxes after an investigation revealed that it “misreported” tens of millions of dollars it had received from foreign governments, but the New York Times never saw that as a news worthy story. Such misrepresentation in filing taxes, were it committed by “Citizen Joe” filing his taxes would have invited the full wrath of the IRS, but not so for the Clintons.

It is no secret that Conservatives always get treated differently by the press, and liberal candidates are never ever held to the same standard, but the level of vitriol and targeting that is directed by the press at Mr. Trump, while simultaneously ignoring all of the scandals surrounding the liberal candidate Mrs. Clinton is unprecedented.

Kudos to Donald Trump for not releasing his taxes if that was a calculated decision on his part. He knows that whatever he does will not satisfy the liberal media. Mitt Romney’s candidacy is there as an example from which he can learn. Romney is one of the most decent men to ever run for office. The guy’s reputation is squeaky clean, but he had his name sullied, and was eviscerated in the press for paying “only” fourteen percent in taxes. According to Politico, together Romney and his wife gave over twenty nine percent of their money to charity, but even that was not enough for the liberal smear machine. It seems that Donald Trump has seen how the press treats the Republican candidate, and he has decided not to corporate with a crusade against himself. The New York times loved Mr. Trump’s comeback story a few years ago, but Mr. Trump has made the cardinal error of running for the Presidency as a Republican against “the anointed one,” Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton, and for that he must be stopped at all cost. In addition to all of that he is the first Republican candidate to fight back against attacks,smears and attempts to soil his name. To be absolutely clear, Mr. Trump is not the ideal candidate, there are many features of the way that he has run his campaign to dislike, but there is nothing in the man’s record that suggests he is a tax cheat.

 

See the links below for references

http://www.nytimes.com/1995/10/25/nyregion/crowning-the-comeback-king.html

http://freebeacon.com/politics/report-96-percent-clintons-charity-donations-went-family-foundation/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/04/05/ST2008040502593.html

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/

As the saying in the hood goes “F da police” (see the link below). These brazen attackers no doubt feel emboldened to attack the police in this manner because of their liberal/leftist enablers and the certitude that they bear no responsibility for any of the bad things in their life. Had this policeman warned them to back off, but they chose instead to keep acting aggressively, and he had to defend himself for fear of his life; had he drawn his weapon and fired it to defend himself, none of the so-called defenders of black people would talk about the behavior of anyone shot.   Instead the headlines would scream “white police officer shoots unarmed black man,” or if the police officer was black; we would only hear “police officer kills unarmed black man”.

As this crusade against the police continues, the people most likely to suffer the worst consequences from it are…you guessed it, the black people who live in many of these crime infested neighborhoods.  The people who continue to sow the seeds of discord do not have to live with the aftermath of their propaganda, telling black people that there is no justice for them. As the police pull back from proactively engaging in the communities in order to protect themselves, and they respond only to 911 calls and unquestionable emergencies, President Obama continues his community agitating. He will never have to deal with the repercussions. He will never have to contend with the blaring sound of sirens going off outside his window in the dead of night or early morning. He lives in a well-protected fortress with many protective assets at his disposal. His children never have to contend with the scourge of drug dealers hanging around their neighborhoods and school, trying to entice them down the forbidden path into a life of drug addiction.  After Hillary Clinton gives another speech about how the police are killing black men and she accuses everyone of “having implicit bias, not just the police” and she keeps that narrative alive, that the system is against black people, she gets to go home surrounded by secret service agents (anyone of whom will jump in front of a bullet to save her life if it ever came to that). She will never have to worry about cowering behind a couch, or under a bed as shots ring out in the night, whizzing by the head of a teenaged son or daughter who was a bit too slow to seek cover in the urban jungle. The beautiful people of Hollywood who continue to fan these flames and pour fuel on them do not think about the toll this would have on the safety of black people who live in these neighborhoods. They do not have to worry about a stray bullet finding its way to the playroom of an innocent two year old, and making its landing place in the skull of God’s precious creation. None of these agitators ever have to agonize about being labeled a snitch or putting their lives in danger if they dare to give the police information that would help to make their neighborhoods safer from the thugs (no, thugs is not a racist term) who terrorize their own neighborhoods. Members of the media get to pontificate from their air conditioned studios as they self-righteously discuss the hysteria that they helped to create. They all get to go home to protected lifestyles that feature perks like gated communities, round the clock security, body guards, or just beautiful suburban living where the biggest altercations anyone has is with the local HMO about the length of a person’s lawn.

They do however get to pat themselves on the back because they “care,” and for promoting a false narrative, convincing themselves that it is the truth.

None of them have the courage to tell that element of the black community who continues to keep their neighborhoods living in fear, to knock it off. They dare not tell them to do some self-examination and honestly confront the problems that continue to keep so many black people lagging behind. These communities will continue to suffer as long as they insist on engaging in victimology spurred on by their willing enablers. Riding the race horse never allows one to be introspective, to honestly tackle the deep seated, hard issues that greatly contribute to the sad state of affairs in too many black communities.  Many white liberals/leftists may think that they are compensating for past sins or the sins of their forefathers, by constantly telling black people that nothing bad that ever happens to them is their own fault.  They need to stop. They are contributing to the problem in a major way. What they need to do is stop cuddling these bad components of the black community and tell them that actions have consequences, to take stock of their lives, and do the things necessary to bring change.

No one is saying that every police shooting is justified; no one is saying that there are no problems with racism, but these are not the core problems of, nor the main causes for the plight of black America. One black woman was recently featured for recently having her fourteenth child with the fourteenth different father. This is not an isolated case, it happens all too often in many black communities. This situation alone tends to have a negative concatenating effect that helps to ramify the turmoil that is a part of so many black communities. The police are not the real problem.

Let’s get fathers to play a bigger role in the lives of their children, in fact; more should be done to ensure that children are part of a stable, healthy two parent home. Stop marinating in the victim mentality, and look internally to solve problems. Stop looking to government as the source of well-being, stress the importance of education, recognize the police are there to protect the communities they serve, comply with their directives, stop being combative (even when you are in the right), and when there are real problems of police brutality and/or racism, use the channels that are in place to fight, and rectify the problems. The old approach is not working.

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/09/26/police-chanted-mob-attacks-chp-officers-vehicle/