To the America hating left who love to talk of America’s past sins, here is a question for you. How come you can’t get over America’s past sins despite all the country has done to correct mistakes of the past, yet you adore the Democrat Party?

Why this willingness to forgive the Democrat Party, but hold on to a grudge against America?

Why do I ask this question?  Well, one more time here is a long list of evil, and atrocities that can directly be attributed to Democrats, and or the Democrat Party.

As you go over this list, ask yourself why you are so bitter against your country, but so loving and gracious toward the Party that is responsible so much horror? 

While America endeavors to deal with problems of race your party currently engaged in the pernicious Critical Race Theory. But not only that, you defend them and make excuses for this evil, plus their open hostility and antagonism against the white male? Just as in the past, they think that their racism is righteous because the group that is the object of their hatred deserves it. Anyway that’s for another discussion. We don’t have to get into that right now.

Back to your disdain for America, but your love for the Democrat Party, the Party that is affiliated with, and had strong ties to all of the following:

Here they are:

Slavery 

The Trail Of Tears

The KKK

Breaking away from the Union and inciting the Civil war to preserve slavery.

Voting against 40 acres and a mule, a law that was meant to pay reparations to slaves who were alive to receive it.

Voted against the:

13th Amendment 

15th Amendment

15 Amendment 

19 Amendment 

Dredd vs Scott

Jim Crow

After the KKK was defeated, they were reborn when progressive hero Woodrow Wilson showed the “The Birth Of A Nation” at the White House giving new life to the terrorist group to wreak havoc on black citizens and others.

Lynchings

The Ocoee massacre

The Rosewood massacre

The Helen massacre

The Oklahoma (black Wall Street) massacre 

There are more but that’s all I’ll name for now.

Peonage (those were the infamous prison camps of the South. Some survivors say they were so terrible they were worse than slavery.

They Democrats virulently opposed desegregation.

When a Democrat did do something of worth, like when Truman desegregated the Military, it was not until Eisenhower came into power that it began to be enforced and take hold.

Whenever you see old videos of the vicious Bull Connor siccing  the dogs on innocent  black marchers, remember that Bill Connor was a Democrat, whose actions were sanctioned by Democrats higher up the chain of power.

Governor George Walllace who uttered the infamous words segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation tomorrow was a Democrat. He was insistent on his segregation forever stance. Eisenhower had to send in troops to stop him from preventing school integration.

Now God bless McGovern. He became truly repentant over his racism, and appears to have made a genuine change in his life. Many black people would vouch for his changed heart. Good for him, but purely as a matter of history segregation was also a part of his record. It’s the same for Storm Thurman and Robert Byrd. Good that they both corrected themselves but they to have a racist history. Thurman became a Republican and Byrd remained a Democrat. It’s noteworthy that the same hatred Democrats harbor toward America, they continued toward Thurmond. They never forgave him for his evil racist, past when he was a Democrat, but they revered Byrd. They even have a highway named after Byrd.

It is because of Democrats that we had the watered down civil rights bills of 1957 and 1960. It was a Democrat who initiated the longest filibuster in American history when they tried to block the civil rights bill of 1964, and many of them were not fond of the subsequent bills in 1965 and 1968 either.

Now some of you will go with the good old reliable “the parties switched theory,” and that’s fine. You say the Dems realized the error of their ways, and turned a new leaf, then the other party started fighting for the votes of the racists in the south. In other words the police just ceased being police after fighting on the side of the law, and suddenly became the bank robbers and murderers. In the meanwhile the murderers and the bank robbers just became the good guys pursuing justice. They became the guardians of justice and took over the job of the police, just like that. Voila! No explanation. 

There is just one issue. All of the Dixiecrats stayed in the Democrat Party except for Storm Thurmond, and a  couple Governors switched from Democrat to Republican. In addition, the South never became Republican until the 1990s, so there is that. 

By that time racism was all a matter of mind reading, like it is today. If you don’t like someone, or a policy, then scream racist. The policy does not actually have to be racist, all you have to do is find a way to frame it as racist and you are golden. That is when the South became Republican.

Sorry for the diversion. Back to the main point, and this is the main point. Don’t miss it please. 

Let’s say the Democrat Party did suddenly, out of nowhere, unexpectedly wake up one morning and say, you know what; it is true we’ve been the Party of every segregationist law. Every one of those racist laws were signed by a Democrat Governor and passed by a Democrat state legislature. That is true. We’ve been the Party of oppression for over 165 years, but we woke up one morning and “the parties switched.” We became the good guys and they became the bad guys.

Even if that is true lefties, how come you are so forgiving of the Democrat Party despite their horrible past, but you are so hard and bitter towards America, despite all af the progress the country has made, and all the effort it continues to make to be a better nation for all? 

What’s up with that lefties?

Rush Limbaugh used to say that the left wants to destroy the country at the core, to rebuild it into the image they have in their mind. His reasoning was that all of the economic turmoil that happens for the most part when they are in charge is on purpose. 

For instance, he used to say that all of the Democrats knew that Obama care would not work the way they said it would. They knew it would drive competition out of the market, cause costs to go up and send the whole thing into chaos. They had to sell it like they think it is a good thing, knowing it would fail. They wanted it to fail because single payer was the ultimate goal, in other words total government control.

Listening to that, the thought would come to mind that Rush is way too suspicious, and cynical of their intentions. They are just terrible at what they do. They are not purposely trying to destroy the country.

Today many conservatives repeat the mantra that everything the left is pushing is with the intent of destroying the economy, cause despair and destroying the social fabric. 

Why would they continue with the energy policy they pursue. Look at inflation, the disruption of the supply chain, the constant outrage, the incessant complaints about racism, pushing all of these legitimately crazy ideas like CRT, transgendenderism, abortion on demand with no limits. It must be on purpose they insist.

It always sounded crazy to these ears, but maybe its true. Remember that the left loves Government control. They believe that the Government is the be all and the end all. To them Government is everything. The Government is the great rescuer, the great equalizer. Every problem can be solved by uncle Govvy.

When chaos reigns, almighty Government can always roll in like a hero to rescue the suffering, taking whatever actions they deem necessary to get control of the situation (that very often they create). We saw it with our neighbors north of our border. Trudeau expressed his love for the Chinese communists. One time when he was asked “Which nation, besides Canada, which nation’s administration do you most admire and why?” Trudeau responded “There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China,”  The aspiring dictator continued “Because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and saying ‘We need to go greenest fastest, we need to start, you know, investing in solar.’”

“There is a flexibility that I know [former Conservative Prime Minister] Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he can do everything he wanted, that I find quite interesting,”

We saw how Trudeau responded with an iron fist to his citizens who were protesting the hard COVTRIP-62 measures he had implemented. He did not hesitate to use some bonafide tyrannical measures to beat down his people in a manner that would make Kim Jeung Un jealous. 

How did he manage to do and get away with this? He declared a state of emergency. In an emergency the Government is forced to take any action neccesary to get control of the situation right? So what did he do? He created conditions that were so overbearing, so oppressive, so unheard of in a modern Democracy, that the people felt they had to respond. When their actions became just a little outside of the line, it was then time to call in the Governments goons. Wave in the storm troopers. It’s an emergency after all (he largely helped create it but who cares?) 

When people feel like the have no way to get redress from their Government and their government responds with a heavy hand, it could lead to more frustration, helplessnes, and eventually fear. When a people fear their government, and their government is willing to use the power of the state to trample on the rights of citizens, it leads to more oppression. Scared people will often do anything to be safe.

On our own soil, the question is, was Rush right? We see some of the same shennanigans. The leftist regime in power is trying to create conditions that lead to frustration and chaos.  It seems like they want to create an atmosphere of desperation and frustration that would eventually lead to them grabbing on to more, and more power, in the effort to limit the power of the people. 

Implement measures that ultimately lead to “emergencies,” then in the effort to quell the emergencies, the Government assumes more and more power. It’s brilliant! We saw it with COVRACKET-37 didn’t we? They used COVRACKET to trample on the rights of citizens in the most brazen fashion, that we never thought possible in America. 

All the leftist drones shook their heads in approval as they willingly acquiesced to the heavy hand of government in the name of safety. My body my choice did not exist during COVESCAM-56. Well not when you are hurting other other people they would santimoniously claim, as they failed to show who you were hurting, while displaying a total lack of self awareness. 

In all of human history it has always been health policy to kwar-ran-teen the sick while those who are well cautiously go about their business and their lives. This time around they caged healthy people, and infringed on their civil liberties of people like they were taking lessons from Stalin himself. They did not hesitate to take people’s jobs, deny the sick medical attention, ban people from public spaces etc. all in the effort to keep us “safe.”

During COVEIDIOCY-72 social media banned anyone with an opinion that contradicted the status quo. It did not matter what the qualifications were of the people they banned. Their history did not matter. Their record did not matter. All that mattered was the messaging. People were only permitted to utter what the government approved. The Government and leftist “fact checker” will be the arbiters of all truth. They would be the only ones to determine what qualifies as disinformation. And all the leftist sheep cheered! Yeah, that’s awesome.

The power players have now been emboldened like never before, and their audacity is absolutely stunning. As they print trillions and trillions of dollars out of thin air, they tell us that is needed to fight inflation. As they spend, spend, spend they tell us that will stimulate the economy to get us where we need to be. They close a blind eye to China. The border is ove run by illegal aliens as they tell us their is no problem at the border. Human trafficking and illegal drugs is flourishing as a result of a lax border policy. 

Their district attorneys refuse to prosecute criminals. They are have implemented no cash bill in many of their cities, leading to a revolving door of criminals terrorizing citizens. Organized retail crime is now a consequence of their crazy policy to not prosecute shoplifting. As a result of all this nonesense, their cities are ridden with crime even more. Homelessness is the new status symbol, to which many in their cities now aspire. 

Even as they flagrantly aim at the innocence of children, sexualizing them and grooming them in the process, they say that we who protest are in the wrong for protesting. We are pushing fear. 

While pushing pernicious racist ideology and openly pursuing racist policies, they call you racist for pointing out their racist policies. They openly attack free speech, and religion. Institutions like the family are now focused in their cross hairs. One of their radical organizations explicitly told us that it was their goal to destroy the nuclear family.

It does not matter where you turn, where you look, what you do. Leftist ideology has weaved itself into into the fabric of society in a  way that we never would have imagined a short while ago. The chaos is all around us.

On top of all of that they tell us that the earth is dying because of climate change, and as a result we have to give more control to the Government to get control of this “existential threat.” It’s not just a message that we should take better care of our environment, which no one objects to doing, no that’s not it. We are killing the earth and we are all about to die, so give them more power. 

Considering all of this, maybe Rush was right. Maybe all of the conspiracy theorists who publicly voice their proposition that this is all by design are right. After all, how many times have we heard them say to “tear it all down” and remake it in their image?

Chaos is their friend. Are they really doing all of this on purpose?

Why is it so important to have more blacks and minority coaches in the NFL? 

This is garbage. Garbage, garbage, garbage!

Ladies and gentlemen, the left destroys everything that it touches. Leftism is a cancer that eats away at the soul. It is now eating away the soul of the NFL with  wokeness run amok.

They have now mandated that every team must now hire a minority offensive coordinator. They can do whatever they want, but this is race baiting to the highest level. 

How about this: white leftist America, black bourgeoisie, Democrat machine, stop it! Stop helping black people for crying out loud.

Do these clowns really want diversity? They do not. If they did, they’d be looking at the disproportionate number of black and minority players in the league, and demanding that there be more white people. 

Blacks make up 14 percent of the population, but they are over 50 percent of the league. If racial equity is what these people really want, they’d be working to ensure that the number of black and white players in the league be proportionate to the number of blacks and whites in the population. 

Blacks make millions and millions of dollars. One guy recently signed a half billion dollar contract, but that is not enough. 

It is all fabulous that black athletes make all this money and dominate the league . Why? Because they are the best. They have earned it.

Now a bunch of white lefties are convincing a significant number of black people that despite all of their success, they are victims. 

There are not enough black coaches and owners is now the grievance of choice. What is wrong with these people? The left continues to push the grievance, and victim culture, and so many black people just continue to embrace it willingly.

Again, why would so many people want to live their lives this way. 

If more black people want to become coaches and owners, then all they have to do is put in the same hard work, and dedication that they put in to become players.

Instead you have these grown men constantly griping about the lack of black coaches and owners.

Black people, we can do better than this. There is no difference between blacks and any other group of people. Blacks can achieve the same level of success as any other group in America. All they have to do is apply the tools of success that  have been known to work, and we will succeed. We will succeed…for good measure, one more time…we will succeed.

We do not need white lefties who do not have our interest at hand to pretend they are our protectors, our saviors, our heroes.

Let’s send these people where they belong…anywhere that that is a far, far, far away from black people where the cannot continue wreaking the destruction they have inflicted on black America.

Break off the chains of mental slavery, and live as free men black America. You are indeed free. Those enslaved by leftist ideology and proponents of leftist ideology, remember that these masters are your masters by choice. These white leftists and their black bourgeoisie allies do not have your best interest at heart.

Remember that!

On talking about the issue of suffering, Professor John Lennox pointed out that most people never get justice in the world. He referenced Adolph Hitler and spoke of how Hitler simply put a bullet to his own head after he had committed the atrocity of killing so many millions of people. If atheism is correct, that is the end of the story for Hitler. No reflecting, no recompense, no justice, no anything, tough! Hitler did what he thought he had to do because he was convinced that it was necessary to achieve his purposes. Who is anyone to say that what he did was wrong? 

It definitely was not good for the people who suffered under his hand, but…wrong?… Who makes that call about right and wrong? Something can be painful. Something can be distressful. A person can find it inconvenient, annoying, hurtful, offensive, or anger inducing when they are personally affected by the inconsiderate actions of others, but in a world where there is no absolute standard by which we judge right and wrong, nothing is right or wrong. If it is all up to human beings to determine what is wrong, then anything goes. 

Some people would be sophisticated enough to come to a common understanding and agree on set rules to govern the society in which they live, but for those who chose to not live by those rules, is that not their choice? If the rule breakers are prepared to deal with the consequences of their actions, whatever those consequences may be, in pursuit of their own desires, why should they not do that? 

One of the most repulsive acts that anyone can commit is the sexual abuse of a child. Nothing stirs the emotions like this act of savage depravity. It certainly evokes raw emotions that make people recoil in absolute horror, and a desire to punish the offenders, but why is it wrong for those who choose not to follow the rules? 

If as some say, human beings are just sophisticated animals, then maybe it really does not matter that some people treat others like animals. They think it does not matter. After all, look at how human beings use animals. We kill animals for meat. We use them to entertain us in zoos. We use them as beasts of burden etc. So what’s the big deal if humans treat other humans like they really are just animals, sophisticated as they may be? 

Some people say that because humans are more cognizant, and they have the ability to reflect and consider their behavior, they have an obligation to behave morally. Is that true though, in a world that has no absolute point of reference to determine right and wrong? Is human cognizance really a good point of reference for morality? What about if one feels compelled to overcome whatever reservations he or she feels about certain behaviors in order to achieve whatever goals that person sets out to accomplish? A person may consider his goals to be so lofty that overcoming conscience may be a price he is willing to pay. If there is no absolute standard or reference to determine right or wrong, one is at liberty to do whatever one pleases.

So lets go back to animals for a minute…in Germany, it only became illegal to have sex with animals about eight years ago. There were actual brothels where people entertained their sexual fantasies with animals. In Northern Columbia, it’s a right of passage for young pubescent boys to have sex with donkeys. Many of the people there talk about it like it is the most natural thing in the world. In an interview, one man even talked about the cultural aspect of the practice, and he stressed that no one should try to impose their beliefs on their community. In a world where human beings are the be all and end all, then these matters really do boil down to what societies are willing to accept at any given time. 

Let’s ask the question again. Is it really wrong when those who do not agree with society’s rules break them? Back to the issue of child sex molestation. There is a whole underground industry dedicated to providing children for sexual exploitation. The people who provide these children to fulfill the sexual desires and fantasies of those willing to pay for them see themselves as simply providing a service. They cater to an elite clientele who does not agree with society’s rules, and are willing to break those rules to fulfill their desires. Sure, it is distressing and traumatizing for the children who are abused, but just like Hitler, those predators too will die, and in the end it really would not matter. The end is the same for all in other words, abusers and the abused. When it is all over, consciousness ceases and there is no memory of anything that has ever transpired during a lifetime. What does it really matter? 

Apart from that innate sense from deep down inside of us that says that these things are wrong, some argue that nothing is objectively wrong. Many are willing to bury that sense of right and wrong in the pursuit of fulflling their desires. Then there are those who, for whatever reason do not have a sense of right or wrong at all. They are fascinated by the idea of breaking the rules. Some experience a high from it. Others get ecstatic joy. Who ultimately decides on what is wrong?  

In a universe where world famous atheist Richard Dawking says we are just random molecules, dancing to our DNA, shouldn’t it be that anything goes? May the fittest survive. Human beings have shown throughout history, that left to their own devices there is no depth to which they are not willing to sink in pursuit of fulfilling their darkest inclinations. Kim Jeong Un feels justified committing the actis of inhumanity that he executes against his people. Isis, the Taliban, Boko Haram and the Mexican Drug Cartel can all give you their justification for the atrocities that they commit. Many of them have seared their consciences, and they feel no remorse for their actions. Most of them will go to their graves without ever facing justice. To reference Dawkins again, he said “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.” If Dawkins is right, who can blame anyone for living an individual life however one sees fit, consequences be damned? 

On the other hand Lennox and others like him believe that there is a superior being to whom human beings are accountable. This being is the ultimate point of reference for morality. If he does not exist then Dawkins is right. We are just molecules without purpose, passing through our universe with no ultimate purpose. For all the acts of injustice, inhumanity, and evil that exist in the world, that is just the way it is. There is no hope for anything better when at death’s door for the pitiful soul who lived a life of suffering, misery and distress. For those who endured the brutality of tyrants, and the cruelty of evil men, there is nothing to look forward to beyond their existence on this earth. But if John Lennox is right, and this superior being that we call God does exist; there is reason for people to hope. Is that true though? 

Does the mere existence of God give reason to hope? There are so many more issues to address on that thought. It is not as simple as it seems. Acknowledging that God exists, if it is true does not answer a lot of questions. What does this God have to say about everything taking place in our world? How do we reach him. Is he him or is he her? David Hume once said “Epicurus’s old questions are still unanswered: Is  God willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then again, perhaps God is exactly as the Bible describes him in the Hebrew scriptures that say “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways. 

Maybe human beings are expected to place their faith in God and trust that he is working everything out with a grand ending in store for those who trust him and have faith in him. Taking that on it’s face leads to other issues. Why the Bible, why the Christian God? Others could make similar claims about Vishnu, Lakshmi, Mohammed, Zeuss or some other deity. Well Christianity makes several truth claims. The people who hold to belief in these other deities also make truth claims. They all have their sacred texts. They have their disciples. They have their messengers. They have their prophets. They all make claims of metaphysical truth. How do we know which God to look to for the true revelation of truth. How do we know what this God is saying to the world. What is his message? how does he expect us to behave to towards one another, and how are human beings supposed to respond to him. 

Bible believers claim that they do not simply proclaim metaphysical truth. They say that anyone can claim to have truth gotten from God, without having any proof to verify their claims. Bible believers say that the Judaeo scriptures contain many verifiable truths. They say that many of the Bible prophets have prophesied world events with a stunning rate of precision and accuracy. This is unlike any other figure who has ever claimed to prophesy in the name of God or otherwise. One of the prophets from the Bible has been so on point with the prophecies that he foretold, scholars and historians have sought to discredit that he actually made those prophecies. Skeptics now claim that he really did not make these prophesies. They say that after many of the world events believers had already happened when he wrote about them, but wrote about them in a way that made it look as though he foretold them. That is how accurate these Bible prophecies are, if indeed they are prophecies.

Bible believers also claim that archaeology backs up many of the things, places, and events the Bible talks about. If fact they say that the Bible is so accurate when it comes to archaeological findings archaeologists use the Bible as a major tool when conducting many of their digs. Many claims that the Bible make, which people once laughed at, have now been verified by archaeologists. Voddie Baucham, a Christian apologist claims that thousands of archaeological digs have confirmed names, places, and events in the Bible. He say that not one of these archaeological findings has ever contradicted the Biblical account on the things to which they pertain. 

Bible believers say that the historicity of the Bible and the characters featured in it are accurate. It is not a history book they say, but the history that it does record is accurate, and much of it can be verified. There are many other claims of veracity that Bible believes make, but perhaps the most audacious one is the claim about the central character in all of scripture, Jesus Christ. 

Jesus Christ was a real historical figure who was also mentioned by extra biblical sources like Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the younger and other ancient historians.  Followers of Christ say that he was brutally, mercilessly beaten and crucified, but raised himself to life again, and promised to return to the earth one day to judge all of humanity, past and present.

Let us go back to the original point about suffering, right and wrong, what the standard, and ultimate reference point of morality is. If there is a God who does exist, if he is the standard and ultimate reference point for morality; human beings would do well to find out what this God has to say to them. The God of the Bible invites everyone who wants to know about him to seek after him. The says God will reveal himself to them. He promises that those who suffer injustice will receive justice, those who committed injustice will pay. Those who followed him in faith will be rewarded. So what exactly is the point of highlighting all of this?

In the search to discover what God is saying, the search must be real. It cannot be half hearted. It must be sincere. As in any other search for truth, the search for metaphysical truth, must involve a careful consideration of all the evidence, the faith to believe that God indeed can be found, and the willingness to go wherever the evidence leads. 

How did we get to the point where the notion of a color blind society is now seen as a bad thing. You see it everywhere in the woke media. Any white person who says they do not look at color is mocked and somehow viewed to be racist. A few years ago Tomi Lahren appeared on Trevor Noah’s nightly show and the discussion was about race. Somewhere in interview Lahren mentioned that she does not see race when she interacts with people. The woke audience groaned in disapproval, and Noah challenged her on the notion that she does not see color. She is not the only one who is mocked for her point of view. That is where we are today in America. 

Whereas once upon a time it was considered as something noble to aim for a colorblind society, today the woke machine does not regard it as noble. They say that in striving to be color blind, those who do so ignore the lived experience of marginalized ethnic groups in our society. Those who talk the most about striving to be color blind can afford that luxury they say.  They do not have to bear the scars, stigma or any of the indignities that people of color have suffered in the past. 

As far as striving for a color blind society is concerned, that notion is the white man’s idea. They can afford to be that way. Besides, by doing so they do not have to acknowledge the past injustices inflicted by white people on every other ethnic group since the beginning of the country. A color blind society is helpful to them. It’s convenient. That way they get to sweep the country’s evil past under the rug of so called color blindness. The wokeratti tell us that getting to the point where people do not see color is racist because it denies the effects of racism that still exists in certain communities. The wokeratti insists that being color blind causes people to ignore the racism that still exists in America today.  

So how do we address this? First of all, it is impossible to not see color when one individual looks at another individual of a different color. In personal encounters that human beings have with each other, It is impossible to not see the distinguishing physical characteristics and features that each person has. Some people are tall, others short. Some people are fat others are thin, and their is a very wide spectrum that lies in between. We love to pretend that everybody is beautiful, but some people are attractive and others are not. That is just the reality of life (whatever the standard of beauty we may hold). We can pretend all day long, but that does not change the facts. 

We see all of these distinct physical characteristics and features each time we step foot out of our doors. We see them in the streets, at the ball park, the DMV, at school, in church (yes even in church), at the store, at the council meeting, at the community center, and every place where human beings gather, or frequent.  

One cannot help but notice these characteristics. It is the same for race. A person interacting with others cannot help but notice that one individual is black, one brown, one white, one has straight hair, course hair, curly hair, slanted eyes, blue eyes, and all of the the other features that contribute in making the races unique. 

Ok, so having said all of this and making it clear that it is impossible to not see race, this might be an appropriate time for an English lesson. 

Hearken back to your middle school days if you don’t mind. All the way back to the sixth or seventh grade. Remember when miss Molly taught you for the first time about idioms and you learned that idioms are meant to convey a certain idea that may not be clearly identified in the literal meaning of the words. Take for instance if someone says “geeze Fitzroy shuddup will ya. Ya talking me to death.” Here is another example: maybe you are taking to long to complete a task, and your team mate says “what’s wrong Jimmy? You are moving slower that pond water.” 

In both instances we know that both Fitzroy and Jimmy are not literally doing what the words of the sentence addressed to them literally mean. It may not be impossible, but it is highly improbable that Fitzroy or anyone for that matter will talk another person to death. In the case of Jimmy, if Jimmy is literally moving slower than pond water we know that he is actually standing still. You get the point. 

So it is when people say that they do not see race. As noted earlier, it is truly impossible to not see race if a person takes the words literally. The statement is meant to convey a certain meaning that the individual saying it is trying to convey. By saying that they do not see race, people mean that when they come in contact with anyone, they do not allow the person’s race to determine how they treat the individual. It is that simple and once upon a time everyone knew that is what the statement meant. 

It meant that you treat everyone with dignity and respect regardless the race of the people with whom you come into contact. To not see race is to see people as human beings first and foremost. Whatever there physical characteristics may be mean absolutely nothing to you. 

You understand that people in certain demographics may have some unique experiences, and circumstances in their lives, but you make no assumptions about them based strictly on their race. Not seeing race means having a governing set of principles about how a person treats everyone that he or she comes into contact with whenever it happens. Not seeing race means that you treat everyone based on the content of their character. You make no judgements about people’s character based on their race because you “do not see race.” 

It is true that there may be some negative circumstances, stereo types, problems and other issues that are more common in some groups than in others, but those things should only matter after you have some familiarity with a person, or have gotten to know an individual really well. In other words, if a white human being comes into contact with a black human being the white human being has never met before; the white human should make absolutely no assumptions or judgements about the black human. The only thing they owe each other is to treat each other with dignity and respect. This is how we should treat whoever we come in contact with for the first time regardless of color. The black person should do it.  The white person should do it. 

If as time goes by, they get to know each other better, and they need to react to unique circumstances in each other’s life; it is only then that they should react to those circumstances whatever they may be. Once again, the white person coming in contact with a black person should not jump to the conclusion that the black person is at a disadvantage in life. He should not assume that the black person is a victim of relentless racism. He should not assume that the black person needs him as an advocate to fight injustice that he believes the black man suffers as a result of the black man’s skin color. 

To reiterate, if after getting to know the black man, the white man finds out that these really are some circumstances in the black man’s life, only then should the white man offer to help in any way that he can. 

The black man on the other hand should not automatically assume that the white guy has all of the advantages of life going his way. He should not assume that the white guy holds animus toward black people. The black man should not think that because the man is white everything in life for him is honky dory, simply because of the color of his skin. If they become more acquainted with each other or they become friends, the black person can make adjustments in his dealings with the white based on the unique circumstances in the white man’s life. He can make those adjustments based on the type of  person the white guy shows himself to be. 

In other words neither of them should see race when dealing with each other. That is the only thing “not seeing race” means. Don’t be fooled by the wokeratti. They know that this is what it means also, but they live in a world that is defined by identity politics. They view everything through the lens of race, and they have a morbid committment to their worldview. 

Those Americans who understand Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream of living in a world where people are not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character should strive to not see race. See human beings instead. Appreciate the differences in people. Celebrate those differences when appropriate, but do not ever think that you are doing anything wrong by refusing to see color.

When you consider CRT and the howls of denial from the left, Democrats, and the media, are you surprised? They tell you that it is the latest Republican ploy to distract you. They tell you that what they are really teaching is “all of American history,” as if we were no already teaching all of American history.

In the meantime when you read what they are actually teaching in many of these schools, it is very simple. It boils down to this, white people baaaaad, white people oppressor, white people have privilege. Black people victims, black people are starting every venture in their life ten paces behind. Black people can’t get ahead because white people baaad! No matter who you are, what your circumstances are; if you are white, you fit into one neat little category. If you are black, no matter what your circumstances are; you fit into one neat little category. 

After many parents (black and white parents), found out what the left is teaching their children in schools, many of them were rightfully outraged. Watching the left wing media go into overdrive defensive mode was stunning to behold. None of these organizations came out and said this is destructive. Not one of them did. Not one! They found a way instead to turn it around on the people opposing the destructive ideology that they are passing on to children. 

Republicans have found a new bogeyman they declared. Republicans are trying to distract you from their racism and white supremacy. Republicans are lying about critical race theory? Critical race theory is not what Republicans say it is? Critical race theory is a nuanced philosophy that is only taught in law schools. In the meanwhile parents are reading on schools’ websites what the schools are actually teaching their children. They are hearing teachers defend it. As parents read it, the left tells parents do not believe your lying eyes. Doubt your untruthful ears. It’s a Republican trick. As parents complain that they have to explain to their 7 year olds that they are not bad people because they are white, lefties shout “you are lying.” It is not really happening. 

So if for instance you are a parent in Cupertino California and your 7 old came home and said “mom guess what we did in school today?” Then she proceeds to tell you that the teacher made the class identify certain things about themselves that were either privileged or oppressed, based on nothing but the child’s immutable identity, as a parent you are just supposed to say; “how inspiring. Good for you kiddo.” If Tucker Carlson takes up the issue on Fox News, or the Gateway Pundit features it, the problems is not what they are actually teaching in said school in Cupertino California or other places. The problem is white supremacy. The problem is white privilege. The problem is Tucker Carlson. The issue is that Republicans pounced on the opportunity to scare people. You understand how that works?

What you really want as a white supremacist is to not teach the truth about systemic racism and American history. If as a parent you complain that in Seattle, schools want to teach that math is racist, you are not supposed to open your eyes wide in disbelief and scream out “whaaaat!” What you are supposed to do is hold up the back of your hand to check your pigmentation. If your pigmentation happens to be what we call white, you then proceed to check your privilege. That’s how it goes. 

Don’t be alarmed if a school in New York asks parents to “reflect on their whiteness,” the parents are supposed to dutifully comply. If you complain that this is not healthy nor is it right, Joy Reid will call you out on her nightly program, complaining about the KKK and white supremacy, and wanting to go back to the 1950s. You’ll either be shamed into accepting the premise of what they are teaching in the schools, or ostracized by the woke brigade. 

If you happen to be a state like Virginia and elect a Governor and Lieutenant Governor, who ran a campaign opposing CRT, the problem is not CRT. The problem is you. You see, teaching identify politics to six year olds is not a bad thing. It does not bad nor does it matter how many schools are teaching this divisive ideology. What is bad and matters most is that “Republicans seized” on the opportunity to fear monger. 

It runs a lot deeper that critical race theory. For instance, if black students are getting disciplined at a higher rate than white and Asian students, you do not look to see why that may be and try to fix it. You do not ask what the reason is if there is an actual discrepancy in bad behavior between the black students, the white students and the Asian students. Should that matter? Nope! All that matters is that there is a discrepancy. Just blame the discrepancy on racism, drop the disciplinary standards for everyone at the school so that you can have a more “even playing field,” with more equitable results. You then watch the school deteriorate as teachers become helpless to do anything. That’s how it goes. 

There is so much more to say on this and other issues that it would require a tome to write on all of them. The problem is never the problem. It is always some nefarious other, like a Republican pouncing, a Republican bogey man, white supremacy, the KKK, or some other nefarious monster to blame. No proof is ever necessary. Just say it. The media runs with it. It becomes the narrative. Voila!

The question is who is surprised by all of this? This is the Democrat Party after all. This is the left. This is who they are. Why stop now? No need to be ashamed. It’s time to double down. If you can’t deny it, triple down, then throw the blame on Republicans.

Do not ever forget that this is the party of the trail of tears, slavery, and the KKK. This is the party that opposed the 13th, 14th, 15th and 19th amendments. This is the party of Jim Crow and the revived KKK when their beloved progressive President Woodrow Wilson showed The Death of A Nation at the White House in 1921. This is the party of lynchings. This is the party that resegregated the Federal Government under Wilson. This is the party of peonage, (a system that many have described as worse than slavery. This is the party of Japanese internment camps. This is the party of the Rosewood massacre, the Ocoee massacre, the Black Wall Street masacre, the Helen massacre and others. This is the party whose legislatures, and Governors have passed almost every single segregationist law in the country (I say almost because someone may find a law or two passed by Republicans and say this is a lie). This is the party whose members vehemently spoke out against Brown vs Board of Education. This is the Party of Bull Connor. This is the party of George Wallace. This is the party that sicced the dogs on peaceful black marchers who were only asking to be treated equally. This is the Party that opposed the first black man selected to the Supreme court. This is the Party that did not support the 1957, and 1960 civil rights bills. This is the party that filibustered the 1964 civil rights bill for 75 days. They’ll gladly tell you that Strom Thurmond became a Republican after that, but they’ll leave out that Robert Byrd, Al Gore Senior, J. William Fullbright, and other Dixiecrats remained Democrats. Only Democrats get forgiveness.

So what is the  purpose of rehashing all of this? It is to stress that you should not be surprised by their staunch defense of CRT, and then trying to blame the fallout from it on Republicans. Remember, that up until today, 18 January 2021, the Democrats have never, ever, apologized for their terrible past. They will be quick to blame America, but they will never point an accusatory finger at themselves. They simply say the parties switched, then they’ll accuse anyone who opposes their policies of being racist, or scream white supremacy at the top of their lungs. 

Ahhh, the life of a Democrat politician!

Folks, racism does not become more acceptable when it is directed at white people  (the white male in particular). All of the hostility that is being directed to white people in the name of this new found wokeness is dangerous.

While everyone pretends to know what is going on in the minds of others and are quick to blame every slight, every misfortune, or difficult circumstance that a black man experiences on racism; real live, blatant racism is ignored.

It is ignored because the target  of the racism belongs to the group against whom racism is now seen as acceptable, the scorned white demographic. 

A few months ago a psychiatrist giving a lecture at Yale said the following: 

“Everyone is talking about race right now. Especially white people.” She was just warming up for the crescendo.  “And yet, white people seem to be losing it. The number of Karens and ‘It’s my right to not wear a mask ‘ videos are exploding. How do we understand this psychologically?” She went on, “Except nothing makes me angrier than a white person who tells me not to be angry,” She was on a roll. “White people make my blood boil.””I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step, like I did the world a f—ing favor.” 

Now if you are troubled by this you should be. This is not your run of the mill internet troll that you battle online, the basement dweller engaging his keyboard warrior skills. This is a professional woman giving a lecture at one of the world’s most prestigious colleges. But that is still not the most alarming thing about that episode. What screams out is the nonchalance with which she gave this lecture to the young skulls filled with nothing but mush. She felt at ease saying something like this.

She is not alone in her sentiments, all you have to do is go on to Campus Reform and other non traditional news sites, and you will be stunned by the sheer amount of anti white sentiment that exists in institutions of learning, and other prominent organizations. Anti whiteness is the hipster method of expressing wokeness. 

Some colleges even have separate graduation ceremonies for blacks and in some case separate housing. Of course they dress it all up in nice sounding phrases like “creating space to celebrate community,” an other fancy excuses that only a woke leftist or Democrat can come up with, but in the end; you can’t hide what it is. It is rank, naked, ugly, unabashed racism

Anti whiteness is even part of official White House policy. The Biden Administration earlier on attempted to exclude white farmers from DOVIS-19 relief. The aid was specifically targeted to people that fit a particular identity and excluded another group. Their physical characteristics determined who was going to get the aid. The White House based their official policy on skin color, eye color, and hair texture. Blacks and minorities were identified as having priority while blacks were more or less told they do not qualify. Whites were farmers were forced to sue the Biden administration because of the racist policy coming directly out of the White House.

In NY, race is one of the considerations to make when dispensing DOVIS-67 monoclonal antibodies to people infected by the COROLLA. 

But this is not all. It does not matter where you go anti-whiteness is prevalent. Turn on MSNBC on any given evening and the things they say about white people would leave you shuddering if you simply replaced the word white with black. But don worry though! They want you to know that it is impossible to be racist towards this group of people.

It is becoming more and more difficult to understand this inside out world in which we live.

The say that when people tell you, and show you who they are, that you should believe them. The left has been showing us and telling us who they are for a while now, but many people still think that they are not a real threat to the country. 

Many Americans think that this is the old political debate of old. One side wants higher taxes, the other side does not. One side thinks that the Government has a bigger obligation to provide for the needs of its citizens, the other side thinks that we need to show people how to be independent, self sufficient and provide for themselves. One side thinks that school choice is a good idea, the other side thinks the money should all go into public education. 

These are just some of the differences that existed in the different ideologies. People were prepared to defend their positions, argue vigorously, vote on them, then the side who presented the best case won. Both sides could actually continue about their business, still respecting one another, and you could rest assured that each side loved their country.  They just shared some differences on the best way to run the country.

Today it is no longer the case. The left hates the country. They despise what it stands for and they wish to tear it down. They have organizations like F Yo Flag. They chant on the streets “death to America.” They say things like “What do you want? Dead Cops! When do you want them? Now!” They have no problem marching through the streets and shouting “Pigs in a blanket, fry em like bacon.” They openly champion the cause of discrimination against, and a hatred of the white male. They are initiating COVID policy that favors black people over whites and they call it progress. 

Once upon a time Bernie Sanders sat on the fringes of the Democrat Party. No one paid him any attention. That’s just crazy Bernie Sanders was the thought. Today Bernie Sanders plays a prominent role in the Democrat Party and he is even bolder expressing his love of socialism. 

The left now has has no problem viciously attacking the first amendment. They are going after religious organizations, trying to force many religions to accept and conform to their evil agenda at the threat of these organizations closing their doors. DA attorneys across America are refusing to prosecute criminals and we are seeing a revolving door of criminals who get free reign to continue their committing their crimes against the citizens of the country. 

It does not matter where you turn. All of the traditional institutions that we once looked to and cherished are under attack from the left, and the left makes no apologies. One of the institution they have laser focused on to destroy is the traditional family. Numerous children are born out of wedlock. Many of these kids are denied the opportunity to grow up in stable homes and reap the benefits of a solid family foundation. Marriages are discarded like old underwear, and sex is promoted as just another physical activity that is no different than any other. There are no boundaries. In schools children’s mindes are being poisoned with the dangerous critical race theory ideology and they are being taught that boys can be girls and girls can be boys. 

Most of all the left is trying to obliterate the concept of God and replace it with the idea that Governments hold the answers to the problems that humanity faces. This is dangerous and will lead to the crumbling of our society faster than any thing. One of the main reasons that America has been so successful and so blessed as a nation is because the founding fathers embraced the Judaeo-Christian principles that have been foundational in the country’s growth. Today the left is on the ascendancy and they are burning away the fabric of our society.

Even though it looks discouraging, and sometimes even hopeless; adopting a hopeless attitude is never an option. The left is on the rise but they still have not managed to completely turn the country into the what they are trying to develop. Do not think for one minute that the old way of doing business is enough. The days of simply leaving it up to voting every two or four years being the extent to which people fight are over. More people have to get involved in the fight to bring attention to the destructive nature of the left’s evil agenda and work to turn things around.  

They have shown us who they are. Believe them!

So here is a question. It is not a rhetorical question (genuinely seeking some thoughts on this). Why is the legacy media doing what they are doing? I am asking this in all earnestness. What is the reason for this? They have always leaned left, but at least there used to be a semblance of making the effort to be balanced. 

Organizations like Fox News were formed to fill a dearth in coverage of the News that neglected the conservative angle. Fox is definitely right leaning news. They do not apologize for it. Their commentators like Carlson, Hannity, Kilmeade, Watters etc. are conservative, and they declare it boldly. On the other hand you have the News department at Fox News, and though they still lean right, you know that Martha McCallum would invite every side on her show and try to give a fair representation of a given story, Brett Baier the same, Chris Wallace Ditto. Shepherd Smith was a liberal. 

The point is that even though Fox is undoubtedly conservative, when it comes to their news department, they are still somewhat in the traditional mode. Even the commentators from whom you know what to expect, they invite real lefties on their shows to have real debates. Most lefties avoid them like the plague, but Tucker will give a lefty a chance to defend himself or make a case. 

On the other hand you have Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and others at CNN, plus the whole cabal at NBC, CBS, ABC etc. Many of their commentators swear that they are straight up news people. They are not opinion journalists. They have their news departments also, but they are so unabashedly to the left that it makes one wonder why they are doing what they are doing. 

It is no longer just a matter of the press being left leaning. It is now evident that they are hell bent on shaping the narrative in a certain direction. Here are a couple examples of what I’m talking about. Observe how they are making a fuss about the let’s go Brandon chants. Those let’s go Brandon chants are the direct result of a reporter trying to cover for President Biden when a crowd was chanting F??? Joe Biden. The point is not about whether or not it’s right to make these vulgar chants, but why would a reporter go out of her way to cover what viewers were hearing for themselves in the background as the people chanted. What is behind this? 

It was par for the course to be disrespectful to Trump and the media never reacted the way they have been reacting to the chants of let’s go Biden. It does not matter how you feel about Trump. That is not the point. Why this flagrant double standard. Robert De Niro shows up to an awards show and the first words out of his mouth is F??? and he is praised. John Legend spewed the most vile commentary at Trump on a regular basis, but he gets to star in commercials for big corporations. A random troll says let’s go Brandon, and he is targeted for destruction. What is this all about?

 How about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial? We have people looked at this case that was so flagrantly biased and one sided, yet they fully bought in to the nonsense about Rittenhouse, but for the people who watched as the case crumbled like a sand castle it was obvious that Rittenhouse’s case was the most obvious example of self defense. If you followed the case from the beginning you would know that Rittenhouse was the complete opposite of who the media portrayed him to be. 

Think of all the prosecutorial misconduct in this case that occured right before our very eyes. People looked at that and were ok with it because of who he was. They media and the left were mad at the judge for calling out the dishonest prosecutor. If ever there was a case that should not have been brought to trial it is this one. Think about the media trying to destroy this young man’s life and the many lies that they told in relation to his case. 

Here’s the thing. A lot of what they had to end up conceding in the end, was covered in right wing news outlets like the Gateway pundit a long time ago. If you read The Daily Caller, or listened to Newsmax, or any one of these despised outlets, you were not surprised when you heard that Rittenhouse did not illegally cross state lines with a weapon. You would have known that months before. You would have known that Rittenhouse’s father lived in the state, and Rittenhouse was deeply connected to the community where his father lived, and where he was that night. You would have known that he worked in the state, and that his home was just a few minutes away in Illinois. 

This young man, by all indicators is a decent citizen, but we saw the media work diligently to portray him as a white supremacist radical.The media covered this case with a one sided zealotry that would rival the Westboro Baptiste church. How about the fact that a 17 year old felt the need to take up arms as he assisted his community during a time of complete break down of law and order? The media never featured that aspect of the story. 

Think of the way that so many in the media and others used their high profile platforms to mocked this young man as he broke down emotionally on the stand. Now think about the coverage just a few weeks after, of a black man who has been involved in what seems to a racist mass killing involving the use of an automible as a weapon in the same state.

Why is the media doing all of this? They don’t just lean left anymore. They are blatant liars. The lies that they tell are huge, big, giant, gargantuan lies and they tell them like we have no access to information (think insurrection, think Wuhan lab, think Russia collusion, think Jussie Smollet, think of the Hunter Biden laptop, think border patrol agents on horseback whipping black Hatians, and much more). 

What is driving all of this?

To my January 6 January 2021 patriot Capitol protesters. Merry Christmas to you.

Much respect to all of you who went down to the nation’s Capitol to protest your Government. Your actions that day are the hallmark of a true Republic. It is a reminder that Government is accountable to the people.

Keep your head up and remember that you have nothing for which to be ashamed. What you do gives  hope that we will survive this strange, weird, upside down period of our history. Plaudits to you, but shame on the people who rioted that day and put a black eye on your noble actions. 

An even bigger shame on the people who try to convince you that you did something wrong. Rest assured that you did not do anything wrong. Do not let anyone tell you different. Shame on the media who consistently repeated the Democrat talking points, and did not even care to honestly discuss the concerns that you had about election fraud. Shame on the people who casually dismissed your concerns. Shame on all of those who instead of looking in to the very specific claims that you made about election irregularities, simply called you kooks.

Shame on all those who refused to even take a look, and examine your claims to see if there was any veracity to them. Shame on those who simply spoke the words “the big lie” without ever giving you your day in court. Shame on the people who rejoiced over the death of  a young woman who was mercilessly shot by an abusive policeman who took her life like she was a stray dog on the streets of Afghanistan. Shame on the media for not holding him to account for the brazen contempt he showed for that woman’s life. Shame on the people who are holding American citizens in jail without any charges,  treating them like enemy combatants, claiming there was an insurrection that day, and using that as an excuse to abuse the rights of Americans.

 There is a lot more shame to go around, but none of it rests on the patriotic shoulders of you who were there in peace to protest, and exercise your patriotic duty. You always have the right in America to challenge your government. Never forget that. Do not ever hang your heads in shame. When the story of 6 January 2021 is told always be proud to say that you were one of those who was there to hold your government accountable.

That is what democracy is all about. If our democracy survives, people like you will be a major reason why it survives. When the black liars matter frauds were tearing up stuff all over the country, the elites cheered. When the mob was marauding through the streets of Democrat cities, burning, looting, destroying, vandalizing, assaulting, and murdering, the power players sitting on high, looking on from their lofty condos applauded. The black liars matter movement had the full support of America’s ruling class as the black liars matter recalcitrants wreaked havoc on private citizens, based on a lie that the police killed a black man for no other reason than the man’s race. When the black liars matter closed off city blocks, renamed it CHAZ, then CHOP, and made life miserable for private citizens in these neighborhoods, our masters roared their approval. 

It is a clear sign of what the nobility thinks of you when they cheer on the destruction of private property. It’s a clear sign of their disdain when they give their consent to thugs, vandals, and malcontents running amok across their cities, terrorizing private citizens. Then moment it got to their doorsteps, with them sitting in their ivory towers, it was no longer cute. Then it was time to bring the full force of the state against anyone who dared challenge their corruption. 

It was ok to terrorize private citizens in their business places and neighborhoods. It was fine to burn private businesses. It was wonderful to plunder as long as it was all happening away from the Haut Monde. Thanks to the patriots of 6 January 2021, the ruling class got a timely reminder that it is the people to whom they must give account. These patriots must not let the actions of a few rogues discourage them from taking action in the future. They cannot allow the dishonest, lying media to kill their spirits. 

Don’t ever let the intimidation tactics of the blue bloods  make them back down.